Showing posts with label NVTC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NVTC. Show all posts

Monday, March 09, 2009

Nominate your customer

NVTC Hot Ticket Awards

Hot Ticket Awards
The Hottest Ticket In Town!

Please join us in nominating the hottest tickets in the DC area! The NVTC Hot Ticket Awards celebrates the efforts of entrepreneurial companies and individuals in our tech community who have exhibited that special something that makes them 'Hot Tickets' - great vision, the ability to implement and deliver, innovative management approach or star-quality charisma!

The Hot Ticket Awards promises to be an energy-packed party, not a sit-down awards banquet with long drawn-out speeches. So, brace yourself for lots of fun and great networking around the pool at the home of NVTC President Bobbie Kilberg! Held on June 24, this event will definitely be the hottest ticket in town!


Resist the temptation to nominate yourself, nominate your customer instead. If they look good, you look good.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Mitch Arnowitz talks about Netpreneur, technology and Perthes disease

Mitch Arnowitz of Tuvel Communications was kind enough to give us an interview about his work for Netpreneur and the other technology groups he has worked with. His son has Perthes disease and he shares part of what he has learned about it.


How did you get interested in technology and communications? Did one come before the other?

I began in sales. From there, I got involved in direct marketing. I was fascinated when I realized, in 1995, that you could find people on the Internet and sell things to them. Fast-forward: I became enamored with the notion of using the Internet to not only broadcast but build relationships. I’m interested in the technology, but only as a means to an end. It’s always about the people and … not the technology. Having said all of that, I am still intrigued with e-mail list software and hosted solutions that support communication programs.


How did you come to found Tuvel Communications?

I was very involved in the Netpreneur program. After the Netpreneur Program went away, I went to work for a technology consulting shop. I was being billed out at an exorbitant rate. I was working with contacts and relationships developed over the years. I knew that I could lower the overhead, charge less and still make a profit while helping my clients. With that notion in mind, I founded Tuvel Communications.

At the same time, I saw a void in the online landscape. There weren’t, and still aren’t, many firms that combined grassroots and social media marketing help clients get their messages out effectively at reasonable costs. E-mail lists, user groups, web forums, niche online communities—these have all become an integral part of marketing. The trick, of course, is to do things the right way and leave a positive lasting impression.

How did you become involved in Netpreneur?

All the way back in 1995, I was working for the Internet’s first “department store” and traveling extensively at the time. A mutual friend put me in touch with Mario Morino. At the time, the Potomac Knowledgeway, Netpreneur’s precursor, was still around. The Netpreneur Program was being hatched. Mario offered me an opportunity to create the program’s marketing program and cut back on my travel.


How do you think the internet boom and bust compares to our present time?

Current economic problems run much deeper than the Internet. When the market imploded in 2000, it seemed to be largely in the tech sector. This time around, everything is affected. The boom-and-bust days were filled with entrepreneurs who knew no limits. A dozen years ago, people were quitting their jobs to work with start-ups or start their own companies. Today, they can’t find jobs and there seem to be fewer resources for start-ups.


How did you become moderator of the AdMarketing discussion list?

My passion has always been in the advertising-marketing-sales space. I developed a plan that helped Netpreneur’s constituency with a one-to-many approach. I realized that I might not have the marketing answer, but that there were others out there who did. To leverage community input, we developed an e-mail list. This enabled us to get answers and build relationships while spreading the word. Then, we built a website and had offline AdMarketing meetings. From there, the concept took off as an e-mail community.


What is important to the maintenance and cultivation of an e-mail discussion list?

A vibrant community needs someone(s) to steer the ship. Not necessarily a moderator, but a facilitator. It’s mission-critical to maintain a core group of supporters. These stakeholders help create and mine content, keep the civil discourse going, and give the facilitator an occasional break. It’s important to establish and maintain the personality and culture of a group. Doing this early on makes it easier to manage expectations.


How did you get involved with the Technology Council of Maryland?

Being a long-time resident of Montgomery County, I’ve been involved with the council for some time. A couple of years ago, the council and my firm began discussions about building relationships through social media. The Tech Council of Maryland, with Tuvel’s guidance, began to use social networking tools for advocacy programs and membership marketing.


How do you see the role of organizations such as NVTC, WTC and TCM?

Regional organizations like these provide necessary infrastructure. As the walls have come down between people and organizations, different types of affinity groups are springing up on social networking sites, in Meetups and other places. It is incumbent upon us all to work together and grow the pie—increase the total opportunities for the whole community. We already see this happening with efforts like Twin Tech.


How you describe Potomac technology culture?

The Washington, DC, culture is an interesting mix of business, government and organizations. A dozen years ago, people said that Washington was turning away from the government sector and defense contractors, and becoming a tech center. These days, the government might be an attractive place to work! With the preponderance of tech companies and regional infrastructure, Washington has always been a tech town. The government, on the other hand, is also here to stay. Washington’s culture will always be that odd mix where business and government come together.

What is Perthes disease? Is there an organization devoted to fighting this disease? What are the particular challenges of coping with a rare disease? Are there any resources you would recommend to families coping with a similar challenge?

Our son was recently diagnosed with Legg-CalvĂ©-Perthes disease, which is a form of osteonecrosis and a rare disease of the hip. It is not life-threatening, but it is serious. One of the challenges is the lack of consensus in the medical community. This leads to confusion. It’s difficult for parents to make treatment discussions. The Internet is a great resource—it allows you to connect with other families going through the same experience. The biggest challenge for any of us is to watch a child in pain and not be able to do anything about it.

Resources:

elansahipguy


Wikipedia: Perthes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legg-Calv%C3%A9-Perthes_syndrome

leggperthessupportgroup
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/leggperthessupportgroup

The National Osteonecrosis Foundation
http://www.nonf.org/perthesbrochure/perthes-brochure.htm

Monday, December 22, 2008

Federal market may be limited

Kim Hart as a report on NVTC's recent panel discussion on surviving the current downturn. The consensus seems to be that the Federal market can no longer be depended upon to keep local technology businesses afloat.

Federal sales cycles typically take three times as long a the commercial market. Certainly the Federal market offers no short term fix.

Edit -
A cheerier view.

Friday, May 11, 2007

Wham! What Vonage’s $58 million surprise means to you

NVTC’s panel discussion on Verizon v Vonage was opened by Barry Goldsmith of Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice. He gave a brief overview of the patents in question and what the jury found. As I understand it, the case revolved around patents that allow a VOIP system to translate domain names into telephone numbers. Vonage has the right to appeal the case to the US Supreme Court, but the legal cost will be very steep.

In order to receive a patent, an invention must be judged to be “unique and non-obvious.” Goldsmith said that in the recent KSR case, the court expanded the definition of non-obvious. Goldsmith thought that the KSR decision might strengthen Vonage’s case.

Jim Kohlenberger, of the Voice On the Internet Coalition, spoke on behalf of a group of VOIP and Web 2.0 companies. He began by explaining that from the very beginning of electronic voice communications, there has been patent litigation. He said that what matters to society is the pace of innovation. Currently, there are 2,273 patents related to VOIP. During the last decade patent litigation has doubled. Kohlenberger suggested that rather than patenting inventions, people are inventing patents.

Congress is concerned about the problems with the system, and legislation has been introduced in the House and Senate in an attempt the remedy to situation. Kohlenberger said that according to a study by MiCRA, if the telephone companies are able to use patents to suppress the new companies, the cost to consumers would be a hundred billion dollars. Some countries are already pulling their analogue systems in favor of a fully digital network.

Marco Rubin, managing partner at Exoventure Associates, gave the venture capitalists’ view of intellectual property. Rubin explained that venture capital investments are easy to get into and hard to exit. Venture capitalists manage a funnel; they might look at a hundred deals, winnow it down to five, and settle on one.

He described the “venture molecule” as a triangle with a management team in a proven domain at the top, protected technology on one side, and a strategic place within a sizable market at the other side.

According to a survey by the Mid-Atlantic Venture Capital Association, lack of clearly protected technology is the number five reason venture capitalists reject deals. Rubin said that there were two kinds of business models for emerging technology: disruptive service, such as eBay, Skype, and Salesforce, or an intellectual property/technology model, such as Motorola, Cisco, and QUALCOMM. Clearly, the importance of intellectual property is dependent upon the business model.

Rubin then reviewed the common ways intellectual property is used: the ever popular litigation model (sue first, ask questions later), the “value creation” model (where an intellectual property portfolio is used as a strategic tool for licensing and cross licensing arrangements), and the tech transfer model (marry an IP/tech cluster with a proven team and seed capital).

Here, the floor was opened for questions. The first questioner asked if intellectual property really mattered for venture backed companies. Rubin responded that venture firms are not interested in investing in litigation.

The next questioner pointed out that Vonage does not actually make products, so was Verizon going after the manufacturers? Goldsmith replied that the components by themselves do not constitute infringement, but rather the way Vonage put them together.

There were questions about how the suit had affected Vonage’s ability to attract business and the size of their litigation war chest. Since only Vonage would know the answer to such questions, there were no clear answers.

One person asked if we would see more such litigation if Verizon prevails. Kohlenberger said that this question goes to the core of the issue; innovation could be stifled.

Friday, May 04, 2007

The public relations of patent litigation

This morning I attended NVTC’s fascinating panel discussion on Verizon vs Vonage. John Kohlenberger of the Voice On the Net coalition had the two full page advertisements Vonage had placed, one in the New York Times, and one in the Wall Street Journal.

Why those papers? All the decision makers they need to influence: Congress, the White House, the Supreme Court, the FCC, FTC, USPTO, etc., are all located in greater Washington. Surely a full page advertisement in the Washington Post would have been more to the purpose.

Why confine your advertising to traditional media? VON’s most likely allies are on the Web. Why not use Blogads?

Monday, April 30, 2007

Help for Virginia Tech

Northern Virginia Technology Council has set up a site for charities.

Coming attractions

DC SPIN, May 2

Battle of the Framework All Stars CMMI for Software vs. SPMN 16 Critical Software Practices



NVTC May, 4, Breakfast

New Media Technologies and Tech Emergence
Wham! What Vonage's $58 Million Surprise Means to YOU



NCC AIIM, May 10, Breakfast

What Does the Future Hold for ECM? Speaker: Russ Stalters, Chief Technology Officer, Applied Information Sciences, Inc.


IPRA, May 10, Luncheon

IPRA's May 2007 Luncheon: PR Practice Spring Tune-up: Everything You Need to Know to Keep Your Business Humming